Here is one example where you need to preserve the numerical format for strings. Suppose you have a 6-digit numeric observation ID, code
, where the first 2 digits represent geographic code and the last 4 digits represent unique observation codes, and you want to generate a new variable, reg
, that represents the 2-digit geographic code. The entries in variable code
, with numeric format %06.0f
will look like: 010001, 010002,…, 250001,…,999999. For variable reg
, entries will be: 01, 02,…,99.
[Note: The format %06.0f
means that code
ixed as a 6
-digit number with leading zeros (i.e. if code
is less than 100000, it has 0’s before the first non-zero digit) and with nothing after the decimal point.]
How will you you go about this? First, you need to transform the numeric code into a string. Why? Because there is no basic number operations that returns the first 2-digit of a number. You cannot P-E-M-D-A-S your way out of this. And, second,you take the subset of the string and call it something else. In Stata, this involves the following commands:
“) /generates the a string variable string1 and preserves the format with leading zeros
) /* generates string variable string2
. It is subset of the string string1, starting at element 1 with length 2 (in short, the first 2 digits). */
What happens if you only write “tostring code
)”? This command will return the string without the leading zeros. For example, from 010001 to “10001.” Then, for observations with code
<100000, the “gen string2
)” will return the 2nd and 3rd digit of the code. You’re screwed!
Another way is to use:
“) /* generates string variable string1 and preserves the format with leading zeros */
Or (the most elegant of all):
In Stata, there are many ways to solve a problem, like there are many ways to prove the Pythagorean theorem. And, like the Pythagorean theorem proofs, there are the very long ones, the shorter ones, and the one that is the most elegant of all.
Filed under: Basic functions | Tagged: format, string, substr, tostring | 1 Comment »